RyanSmithAT: And the official name for/description of the new AMD/GloFo wafer supply agreement?.
![asrock ion 330 pro gaming asrock ion 330 pro gaming](https://d1fmx1rbmqrxrr.cloudfront.net/cnet/optim/i/blogeee/2009/09/asrock-ion330__w1200.jpg)
![asrock ion 330 pro gaming asrock ion 330 pro gaming](https://dyw7ncnq1en5l.cloudfront.net/produits/447/8015/ASRock_ION330-BD_Back.jpg)
RyanSmithAT: Eh, no more than any other old SSD.If nothing else, there's one nice thing about Wind… RyanSmithAT: I updated my personal rig from to 21H1 this evening.They are never quite as useful as they should be, but the engineering is fun to see RyanSmithAT: I have to admit I miss crazy memory devices.IanCutress: 3/ Also to mention, if they decided not to build anything new because they can keep pumping out 3090-class hardware….A ??? belated production filmed a few weeks back about AMD's 2022 server road… IanCutress: Breaking the internet: CPUs and Cats.IanCutress: Can't find a way to make a local copy :(.IanCutress: I've got several of those, some work in some situations and others in others.Overclocking the CPU to 2GHz brought the encode time down to 318 seconds doing the same to the GPU (600MHz core, 1.4GHz shader clock) and turning on CUDA support brought the total time down to 203 seconds. Turning on GPU acceleration dropped the time to 261 seconds. Using one of our standard transcoding test files Gary made a high quality YouTube video with just the Atom 330 CPU in 405 seconds. Gary had a particularly great experience with transcoding using Cyberlink's Media Espresso. The GPU can definitely help Atom in some situations if there's proper support, but don't expect to really ever make an Ion "fast" by today's standards. I still maintain that the Atom CPU is not fast enough for a good gaming experience on far too many modern titles, but to NVIDIA’s credit, the Ion platform does make it fast enough in games that it otherwise wouldn’t be.ĬUDA performance is a bit similar. Far Cry 2 and Crysis Warhead will give you under 7 fps for Zotac’s Ion platform, but other, more mainstream titles will perform similarly if not better. Most modern FPS games will show worse performance than what we just saw under WoW. I didn’t even bother benchmarking the single core version I’m not that fond of single digits. The Intel D945GCLF2 managed a whopping 3 fps. If I dropped the settings even lower I could easily get a smooth experience.
![asrock ion 330 pro gaming asrock ion 330 pro gaming](https://static.tweaktown.com/content/3/7/3702_01.png)
The Ion platform managed just under 18 fps, which wasn’t incredibly smooth to play on but it was close. This is the same chart from the Pentium 4 section but I'm repeating it here so you have something to look at while we discuss the gaming potential of Ion: I tested by running through a small outdoor section at 800 x 600 (24-bit color, no AA) using WoW’s built in “Good” visual quality settings. World of Warcraft does a great job of straddling the line between casual and hardcore gaming and thus makes a good candidate for looking at gaming performance of Ion vs. I’ll put aside debates of whether or not you would want to game on an Atom for a moment. The gaming performance of Intel’s basic Atom platform is a joke.
![asrock ion 330 pro gaming asrock ion 330 pro gaming](https://dyw7ncnq1en5l.cloudfront.net/produits/447/8015/ASRock_ION330-BD_Inside.jpg)
I already went through this in the Zotac review, allow me to quote: If you want more detail on how the Atom 330 compares to an older platform like a Pentium 4, check out the Zotac review. This accomplishes two things: 1) it shows you that the ASUS Ion performs identically to the Zotac Ion, and 2) it puts the Atom 330’s performance in perspective compared to other non-Atom based platforms. In case you missed it, I’m providing some comparison numbers between the ASUS Ion and the systems I tested in the Zotac Ion review.